A Juridical-Normative Study of the Position of Children as Witnesses in Proving Domestic Violence Cases
Keywords:
witness position, child witness, evidentiary process, domestic violance, child protectionAbstract
Domestic Violence (KDRT) is a complex phenomenon often occurring within the private sphere, making family members, including children, key witnesses. A child's testimony is of high urgency in uncovering the material truth, yet their standing in criminal procedural law remains debatable. This research aims to conduct a normative-juridical analysis of the legal position of children as witnesses and the evidentiary strength of their testimony in domestic violence cases. The research method employed is normative-juridical, utilizing a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Data were analyzed qualitatively by examining primary legislation such as Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The findings indicate that Indonesian positive law, in principle, recognizes children as valid witnesses. However, implementation challenges exist regarding the assessment of their evidentiary strength. A child's testimony often requires special treatment, such as psychological assistance, to meet the formal and material requirements to be considered valid evidence in court. This research concludes that there is an urgent need for regulatory harmonization and technical guidelines for law enforcement officials to ensure the protection of the child's rights as a witness, while simultaneously ensuring their testimony can be effectively used to achieve justice for victims of domestic violence.
References
Komnas Perempuan.: (2023). Annual Report on Violence Against Women 2022. Komnas Perempuan, Jakarta.
UNICEF.: (2019). Behind Closed Doors: The Impact of Domestic Violence on Children. UNICEF Publications, New York.
Harahap, M.Y.: (2000). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Soekanto, S. & Mamudji, S.: (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Marzuki, P.M.: (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana, Jakarta.
Ali, Z.: (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Republic of Indonesia.: (1981). Criminal Procedure Code. State Gazette of the RI of 1981, No. 76.
Hiariej, E.O.S.: (2012). Teori dan Praktik Hukum Acara Pidana. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Chazawi, A.: (2013). Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Alumni, Bandung.
Republic of Indonesia.: (2014). Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. State Gazette of the RI of 2014, No. 297.
Prodjohamidjojo, M.: (2000). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
LBH APIK.: (2018). Panduan Penanganan Kasus KDRT: Perspektif Korban. LBH APIK, Jakarta.
Republic of Indonesia.: (2012). Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. State Gazette of the RI of 2012, No. 153.
Wiyono, R.: (2016). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Marni, N. & Suardana, I.W.: (2019). Problematika Pemeriksaan Saksi Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana. Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 210-221.
