Evaluation of Internal Quality Assurance Implementation at Atma Jaya Catholic University
Keywords:
Evaluation, CIPP Model, Quality Assurance, Higher Education.Abstract
This study evaluates the implementation of quality assurance at a private university in Indonesia, namely Atma Jaya Catholic University, Jakarta (UAJJ). The aim is to find out the quality (merit) and benefits (worth) of implementing the SPMI program at UAJJ comprehensively because stakeholders do not understand it. UAJJ itself has implemented SPMI (Internal Quality Assurance System) consistently since 2017 based on the PPEPP model cycle (Penetapan=Determination, Pelaksanaan=Implementation, Evaluasi=Evaluation, Pengelolaan=Management, and Peningkatan=Improvement) as an implementation guideline. This qualitative method uses the evaluation of the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam. The CIPP model consists of the Context, Input, Process, and Product components and each related sub-component. The components and sub-components become the object of this research. The results and data analysis show that the implementation of Internal Quality Assurance in the UAJJ is of high quality and beneficial for all stakeholders. The conclusion and discussion materials are that quality assurance efforts and internal QA implementation, both at UAJJ, other higher education institutions, and professional researchers need to develop and seek internal QA implementation strategies to ensure the health of higher education institutions, especially in the three core values, namely student learning, research, and community service.
References
Direktoral Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2006). Panduan Pelaksanaan Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Perguruantinggi (SPM-PT). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Dontagic, S., & Sarlic, S. (2015). Quality Assessment in Higher Education Using The Servqual Model. Journal Management, , Vol. 20, 2015, 1, pp. 39-57(Quality Assessement in HE), 39-57.
Legčević, J., & Hećimović, a. V. (2016). International Quality Assurance at Higher Education INstitution. POSLOVNA IZVRSNOST ZAGREB, GOD. , X (2016) BR. 2(QA in HE), 75-87.
Lucandera, H., & Christerssona, C. (2020). Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment. Online.
McDavid, J. C., & Hawthon, L. R. (2006). Program Evaluation & Performance Measurement: An Introduce to Practice. ISBN: 1-41290668-7 (pbk). New Dehli: Sage Publications India, Pvt.Ltd.
Prisacariu, A. (2015). New Perspectives of Quality Assurance in European Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 180 (2015) 119 – 126, Published by Elsevier Ltd(New Prespectives of QA HE), 119-126.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). The CIPP Model For Evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F.MadauS, & a. T. Kellaghan, Evaluation Models ViewpointsEducational and Human Services Evaluation (2nd Edition) (pp. 279-317). New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moskow: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & and Anthony J.Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation, Theory, Models, & Applications,. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., L.S., C., & Chris. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. Second Edition. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, a. K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, Assessment, of service-Learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach Engagement, Volume 15, Number 4, p. 57, (2011)(Using evaluation model CIPP), 63-66.
