Legal Protection of Child Perpetrators in Child Violence Crimes Which Resulted in Death (Case Study of Judgment Number: 9/PID. SUS-Child//2020/PT DKI Jo. Decision Number: 12/PID. SUS-Children/2020/PN JKT. PST)
Keywords:
Legal Protection; Child; Crime of Violence; Death.Abstract
The 1945 Constitution embodies the basic rights that every individual must enjoy, legal certainty is the essence of law itself. The legal system must realize three basic values: justice (philosophical aspect), certainty (juridical aspect), and usefulness (sociological aspect). The application of Diversion in the Juvenile Justice System can only be carried out against children if the child commits a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment of less than 7 (seven) years and is not a repeat offender. The research used normative juridical method with empirical juridical approach, the research used secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection. The form of legal protection regardless of his actions that violate the law. Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System pays attention to the conditions and motives of the perpetrator at the time of committing the crime. Decision Number: 9/PID.SUS-Anak//2020/PT.DKI. Decision Number: 12/PID.SUS-Anak/2020/PN JKT.PST. Juridical considerations of judges for criminal acts of violence resulting in the death of children and children as perpetrators of sentencing of children prioritize the principle of the best interests of the child and the rights of the child, as specified in Article 2 point (d) and Article 3 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The judge considers the interests of the child's family as a victim, holding a sense of justice for the perpetrator and victim. Philosophical considerations. finding the truth, creating justice. Sociological considerations, achieving Restorative Justice through Diversion. Although diversion could not be carried out, the judge made a decision to release the child from punishment. The judge considered the defendant's condition requires social rehabilitation, assistance by social workers, forensic psychologists, caregivers and religious mentors, routine health and pregnancy checks, continuing education, and parents to provide more time for assistance.
References
A. Sonny Keraf & Mikhael Dua, 2001, Ilmu Pengetahuan (Sebuah Tinjauan, Filosofis), Yogyakarta: Kanisius,
Ahmad Kamil dan Fauzan, 2008, Hukum Perlindungan dan Pengangkatan Anak di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada
Atmasasmita, Romli, 1983, Problema Kenakalan Anak-Anak/ Remaja, Jakarta: Armico.
Chazawi, Adami, 2002, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 2: Penafsiran Hukum Pidana, Dasar Pemidanaan, Pemberatan & Peringanan, Kejahatan Aduan, Perbarengan & Ajaran Kausalitas, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Diantha, I Made, 2016, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Jakarta; Kencana
Djamil, M. Nasir, 2013, Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum Catatan Pembahasan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU-SPPA), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Gultom, Maidin, 2009, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama
Hamzah, Andi, 1994, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Hardjon, 2007, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak, Jakarta: Eresco
Herlina, Apong, 2004, Perlindungan terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum, Jakarta: Unicef
Ibrahim, Johny, 2006, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Surabaya: Banyumedia Publishing
Ilyas, Amir, 2012, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education
J. J. J. M. Wuisman, 1996, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Jilid 1 : Asas-Asas), disunting oleh: M. Hasyam, Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia
Kusuma, Mulyana W., 1984, Kriminologi dan Masalah Kejahatan, Bandung: Armico
Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Jakarta, 2012, Mengawal Perlindungan Anak Berhadapan dengan Hakim: Pendidikan dan Laporan Monitoring Paralegal LBH Jakarta untuk Anak Berhadapan dengan Hukum, Jakarta: LBH Jakarta
Lilik Mulyadi, 2001, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Maidin, Gultom, 2014, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama
Marlina, 2009, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice), Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama
Moeljanto, 2009, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineke Cipta
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2010, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: PT.Alumni
Mulyadi, Lilik, 2014, Wajah Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Alumni
Nicholas MC Bala dan Rebecca Jaremko Bromwich, 2002, Juvenile Justice System an International Comparison of Problem and Solutions, Toronto: Educational Publishing Inc
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2009, Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis Serta Pengalaman-Pengalaman di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing
Rifai, Ahmad, 2014, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim: dalam prespektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Saebeni, Beni Ahmad, 2007 Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta: Pustaka Setia
Siregar, Bismar, 1998, Hukum dan Hak-Hak Anak, Jakarta: Rajawali
Supramono, Gatot, 2007 Hukum Acara Pengadilan Anak, Jakarta: Percetakan Intan Sejati Klaten,
Wadang, Maulana Hasan, 2000, Advokasi dan Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana
Wagiati Soetedjo, dkk, 2013, Hukum Pidana Anak, Bandung: Refika Aditama
Waludi, 2009, Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Bandung: Maju Mundur
Irawati, A. C. (2021). Tindak Pidana Oleh Anak: Suatu Kajian Dan Analisis Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum. https://doi.org/10.35973/jidh.v0i0.1929
Irawati, A. C. (2022). Konstruksi Hukum Kerahasiaan Identitas Anak Terhadap Korban, Pelaku Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Rampai Jurnal Hukum (RJH). https://doi.org/10.35473/rjh.v1i1.1664
Irawati, A. C. (2023). The Formal Criminal Law Renewal: Due Process of Law in Pre-trial for Legal Assurance. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_32
Irawati, A. C., Susilo, A. B., & Yuliawan, I. (2021). Policy of Criminal Left in Overcoming the Impact of Criminal Actions of Pedophilia in Indonesia. 584(Icorsh 2020), 831–837.
Irawati, A. C., & Wijaya, H. (2023). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Advancing Justice : Embracing a Progressive Legal Framework for Case Resolution in Central Java Police Criminal Investigation ( A Case Study at Polda Ditreskrimsus ). 2011, 315–320.
Putri Diana, & Arista Candra Irawati. (2022). Analisis Pola Asuh Orang Tua Terhdap Anak Yang Mengalami Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT). Rampai Jurnal Hukum (RJH). https://doi.org/10.35473/rjh.v1i2.2238
Laws and Regulations
Republic of Indonesia, Constitution of 1945
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection into Law
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection
Republic of Indonesia, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (HAM)
Presidential Decree No. 36 of 1990 concerning the Ratification of the Convention On The Rights Of The Child
Criminal Code (KUHP)
Republic of Indonesia, Attorney General Regulation No. 06/A/J.A/04/2015 concerning Diversion Implementation Guidelines.
Republic of Indonesia, Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
Republic of Indonesia, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children Under the Age of 12
Republic of Indonesia, Appeal Decision Number: 9/PID. SUS-Child//2020/PT DKI
Republic of Indonesia, Decision Number: 12/PID. SUS-Children/2020/PN JKT. PST
